Atomic Energy
“The element uranium
may be turned into new and important sources of energy” Einstein (1933)
“I am become death, destroyer of worlds” J. Robert Oppenheimer (fewer than 10 years later)
“Science has nothing to be ashamed of, even in the ruins of Nagasaki” Jacob Bronowski (conversely)
“I am become death, destroyer of worlds” J. Robert Oppenheimer (fewer than 10 years later)
“Science has nothing to be ashamed of, even in the ruins of Nagasaki” Jacob Bronowski (conversely)
Considering these
statements, and the on-going development of atomic energy and its uses, write
an essay that:
a)
explains atomic energy
b)
compares the arguments for and against the use
of atomic energy
c)
presents your position on atomic energy
What is Atomic Energy?
Atomic energy is
energy produced by atoms and most commonly referred to as nuclear energy.
Nuclear energy is the result of splitting uranium atoms in a process called fission.
Scientists discovered that when an atom
of uranium is struck by a fast moving particle called a neutron it breaks into
two or three pieces. The splitting of the uranium produces vast amounts of
energy in the form of both heat and light. The energy from splitting the atoms,
when slowly released, can be used to produce electricity. When this chain
reaction isn’t controlled and the energy is released all at once, a tremendous
explosion occurs.
The energy from
fission can be harnessed in a nuclear power plant by controlling and slowing down
the chain reaction. When harnessing the energy, small amounts of uranium are
placed inside long rods and loaded into nuclear reactors. Inside these nuclear
reactors the atoms are split apart in a controlled and safe manner.
In the chain
reaction, particles released from the splitting of one uranium atom can go on
to split other uranium atoms. In order to control this chain reaction, control
rods are used to regulate the splitting so that it does not occur too quickly.
This chain reaction
produces heat energy which, in turn, is used to produce electricity.
Short History of the Development of Atomic Energy
The development of
atomic energy started 200 years ago and is still on-going today.
In 1895 a German physicist
discovered x-rays and since then contributions to the development of atomic
energy have included the discovery of the electron, radioactive elements in
radium and polonium, rays emitting from radium, isotopes, the theory of
radioactive decay, the theory of relativity (E=mc²), the nucleus of an atom, the theory
of atomic structure, nuclear reactions and quantum mechanics.
The power of nuclear
energy soon became clear and a letter to President Roosevelt from Albert
Einstein outlined its potential use as a dangerous weapon.
This letter includes
the quote – “the element uranium may be turned into new and important sources
of energy” (Albert Einstein, 1939). Before the Second World War, the element
uranium had no known practical use. The letter was a warning to President
Roosevelt during the Second World War of the possibility of constructing an
extremely powerful bomb. In his letter, Einstein hinted that the German
government intended to do just this.
Although
there were many contributions, Einstein’s theory of relativity (E=mc²) was the
most significant addition to the development of atomic energy.
Uses of Atomic/Nuclear Energy
Weaponry, Energy, Medicine
Weaponry, Energy, Medicine
There are many uses
for nuclear energy, some of which have only been identified very recently while
others have been refined and developed to become more efficient and practical.
Weaponry
Energy
Medicine
Nuclear energy also
plays a significant role in medicine. Nuclear energy plays a role in both the
diagnosis and treatment process. Millions of nuclear medical procedures are
undertaken each year. It is used to identify and treat many diseases and has
potential to benefit the medical field greatly in the future.
For and Against
Since nuclear energy
was first introduced there has always been a debate about whether or not
nuclear energy should be used. Originally, it was feared as a weapon and when
they started using it for electricity, there was strong objection and
disapproval. Nuclear energy has many advantages and disadvantages and has
impacted the world for both good and bad.
Economic
Nuclear energy has
impacted the world economy both positively and negatively. There are huge economic
benefits in building a nuclear power plant and using nuclear energy. These
benefits include the creation of millions of job opportunities, the ability to
generate substantial revenue in electricity sales and the fact that it consumes
a large amount and a range of different materials. As well as having many economical benefits,
nuclear energy also has some disadvantages in terms of economic growth. The
cost of building and financing a nuclear plant is very high and the cost of
creating one is on the rise due to the shortage of parts and skills. Generally,
most people agree that the economic advantages of using nuclear power outweigh
the disadvantages but there is still much debate about whether the economic
advantages are enough to overlook the other detriments.
Environmental
The most
controversial debate about nuclear power is whether it is better for the
environment than other power sources or whether it just affects the environment
in different ways. Both sides of the argument are relevant and important. On
one side, nuclear energy appears to be a clean energy source that meets our
growing energy needs. It helps to reduce green house gas emissions and has
decreased our reliance on fossil fuels such as coal. Since nuclear power plants
don’t ‘burn’ anything they also help protect air quality. However, on the other
side nuclear power produces a lot of waste material. This waste material, or
radioactive waste, takes thousands of years to decay and can be very harmful to
the environment. It can impact the atmosphere, water sources and crops. There
are limited options when it comes to disposing this waste safely for the long
period of time that it needs to decay. This problem is a huge factor to
consider when deciding whether or not you support nuclear power.
Moral
The moral and
ethical aspects in the debate for and against nuclear energy are both prominent
and important. This is where the quotes from both Oppenheimer and Bronowski
have to be considered. The quote, “science has nothing to be ashamed of, even
in the ruins of Nagasaki” (Jacob Bronowski), suggests that even after nuclear
power was used to kill thousands of people, science cannot be blamed. Some
believe that he is right in the fact that it was not science that caused those
deaths but people and their immorality. Nuclear weapons are often the topic of
debate when it comes to morals and what is acceptable in warfare. Although the
US, UK and Russia have signed a treaty against the use of nuclear weapons,
there is still approximately 23,000 in existence. After the first atomic bomb
was detonated in New Mexico, Robert Oppenheimer, who had a role in the project,
was noted as saying “I am become death, the destroyer of worlds”. Within a month of him saying this, two atomic
bombs were dropped on Japan. Another aspect that cannot be ignored when
considering the moral decisions is the numerous meltdowns and nuclear
accidents, the most recent of which happened last year after a tsunami hit the
coast of Japan. There have been abundant nuclear accidents which have caused
many health and environmental problems. The radiation from these ‘meltdowns’
has been known to cause cases of radioactive contamination and radiation
poisoning leading to the death of humans and animals. The debate for and
against always comes back to who is to blame for these problems. Nuclear power
may be the right solution for our future but there is the fear of what humans
could purposely or accidentally do with it and therefore has been treated with
trepidation.
Discussion
I believe that nuclear
power is an important and efficient source of energy that is a very good
alternative to fossil fuels that emit harmful gases. I also believe that while
the nuclear plants that we already have should be well maintained and continue
to be used, the money invested in new projects should be used elsewhere.
Instead of funding new power plants, this money should go towards more
reliable, safe and renewable energy sources and towards research for a better
way to dispose of nuclear waste and for developing safer and more reliable ways
of obtaining energy from nuclear reactions.
Bibliography
World Nuclear Association, 2011. ‘History of Nuclear Energy’. Retrieved 22nd January, 2012 from http://world-nuclear.org/info/inf54.html
Vujovik, L 2009. ‘Albert
Einstein’. Retrieved 23rd January, 2012 from http://www.teslasociety.com/einstein.htm
Westinghouse, 2012. ‘What is
Nuclear Energy’. Retrieved 23rd January, 2012 from http://www.westinghousenuclear.com/Community/WhatIsNuclearEnergy.shtm
Edgreen, 2009. ‘Nuclear
Energy’. Retrieved 23rd January, 2012 from http://edugreen.teri.res.in/explore/n_renew/nuclear.htm
Energy Information
Administration, 2011. ‘EIA Energy Kids – Nuclear’. Retrieved 24th
January, 2012 from http://www.eia.gov/kids/energy.cfm?page=tl_nuclear
Elert, G 2008. ‘Einstein’s
letter to Roosevelt’. Retrieved 24th January, 2012 from http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml
HK, 2008. ‘Power Production,
Nuclear Power’. Retrieved 25th January, 2012 from http://www.hk-phy.org/energy/power/print/nuclear_phy_print_e.html
Bellis, M 2010. ‘Atomic Bomb
Detonation at Hiroshima’. Retrieved 25th January, 2012 from http://inventors.about.com/od/astartinventions/a/atomic_bomb_2.htm
John F. Kennedy Presidential
Library and Museum, 2011. ‘Nuclear Test Ban Treaty’. Retrieved 25th
January, 2012 from http://www.jfklibrary.org/JFK/JFK-in-History/Nuclear-Test-Ban-Treaty.aspx
Peace Pledge Union, 2012.
‘Atomic Bomb.’ Retrieved 27th January, 2012 from http://www.ppu.org.uk/learn/info/atom1.html
Krieger, D 2012. ‘Nuclear
Weapons’. Retrieved 27th January, 2012 from http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=18359
Weaver, L 2011. ‘Nuclear Power
Good for Economy’. Retrieved 27th January, 2012 from http://www.theledger.com/article/20090128/COLUMNISTS/901280304?p=1&tc=pg
Centre for American Progress,
2011. ’10 Reasons Not to Invest in Nuclear Energy’. Retrieved 28th
January, 2012 from http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2008/07/nuclear_energy.html
Nuclear
Energy Institute, 2012. ‘Nuclear Energy’s Economic Benefits’. Retrieved 28th
January, 2012 from http://www.nei.org/resourcesandstats/documentlibrary/newplants/whitepaper/jobsTotty, M 2012. ‘The Case For and Against Nuclear Energy’. Retrieved 28th January, 2012 from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121432182593500119.html
No comments:
Post a Comment